<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>NEWS &amp; LEGAL</title>
        <link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/forums/58</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ <strong>News &amp; developments in the Franchising Industry that you will find interesting &amp; helpful.</strong> ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 10:16:45 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:43:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ A.C.C.C. INSTITUTES PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SEAL-A-FRIDGE PTY LTD ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/398/t/A-C-C-C-INSTITUTES-PROCEEDINGS-AGAINST-SEAL-A-FRIDGE-PTY-LTD.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court in Brisbane against Seal-A-Fridge Pty Ltd and its director,
Mr Nigel Rooney.
<br>
<br>
The ACCC alleges that Seal-A-Fridge engaged in unconscionable conduct towards its franchisees in contravention of section 51AC of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
<br>
The ACCC also alleges that Seal-A-Fridge failed to comply with the Franchising Code of Conduct, which amounts to a contravention of section 51AD of... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/398</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Bakers Delight NOT being pursued by ACCC ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/389/t/Bakers-Delight-NOT-being-pursued-by-ACCC.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The ACCC is not convinced regarding the allegations made against the Bakers Delight, and has decided not to take any further action.
<br>
For a more complete report see <a href="http://www.smartcompany.com.au/Free-Articles/The-Briefing/20080423-Bakers-Delight-franchise-off-the-ACCC-hook.html?source=RSS" target="_blank">Bakers Delight
franchise off the ACCC hook</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/389</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:00:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Video Ezy appears to be keeping up with technology changes and keeping their franchisees in business! ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/385/t/Video-Ezy-appears---keeping---technology-changes--keeping--f.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ There&#39;s nothing worse than a franchisor that stubbornly refuses to see that its product is destined for the technological scrap heap.
<br>
<br>
We&#39;re delighted to see that Video Ezy appears to be &quot;on top of it&quot;, and will be introducing a product delivery method which is more in keeping
with where technology is headed.
<br>
<br>
The header of the news report is as follows: &quot;Video Ezy, one of Australia&#39;s largest movie rental franchises, has selected Ireland&#39;s... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/385</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:11:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Allphones. Another case of misleading & deceptive conduct? ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/384/t/Allphones-Another-case-of-misleading-deceptive-conduct-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ According to their website &quot;the (Allphones) retail network is now in every Australian State and Territory, with 160 outlets and over 100 franchisees.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<strong>These extracts below from the ACCC News Release dated 27 march 2008.</strong>
<br>
<br>
The ACCC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court in Sydney against Allphones Retail Pty Limited.
<br>
The ACCC alleges that, in operating this franchise system, Allphones failed to comply with Franchising Code of Conduct and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/384</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Imagine Services made misleading representations... ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/382/t/Imagine-Services-made-misleading-representations-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <strong>These are some extracts from a News Release by the ACCC.</strong>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission obtained orders by consent
<br>
<br>
yesterday in the Federal Court at Melbourne against Imagine Essential Services
<br>
<br>
Limited and its founder and former Chief Executive Officer, Mr Richard Evans*, for
<br>
<br>
breaches of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
The ACCC alleged Imagine made misleading representations in connection... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/382</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Franchisors raising money to fight franchisees in the High Court. ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/374/t/Franchisors-raising-money--fight-franchisees---High-Court-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A recent finding in the Court of Appeal (Ketchell v Master Education Services) held that where a franchisor does not have a written acknowledgment that a
franchisee has received, read and had an opportunity to understand the disclosure document, the franchise agreement is unlawful and unenforceable.
<br>
<br>
This may prove to be a massive problem for franchisors. The Franchise Council of Australia have made a submission in support of the application for leave to
appeal. Why? Because they... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/374</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:10:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Franchising Code of Conduct, Amendments - March 08 ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/372/t/Franchising-Code-of-Conduct-Amendments-March-08.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Franchising Code of Conduct (the code) has recently been amended. These amendments will come into effect on 1 March 2008. The amendments increase the
obligations of the Franchisor in relation to aspects such as: (<strong>Note: these are incomplete &amp; are summarized, and must not be relied on as
definitive. They are not. The detailed provisions must be studied</strong>):
<br>

<ol>
  <li>The franchisor must provide a copy of the franchise agreement in the form it is to be... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/372</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Major Franchise Brands Accused ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/371/t/Major-Franchise-Brands-Accused.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Some of the biggest brands in franchising are being accused of fraud, collusion, and unconscionable conduct against their franchisees.
<br>
More than 30 disgruntled former franchisees from Bakers Delight, Lenard&#39;s Chicken, Midas, Michel&#39;s Patisserie, Hungry Jacks and Howard&#39;s Storage
World have joined forces to take on the franchise chains. See the complete article at <a target="_blank"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Micmarcmm)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.franchiseesforum.com/topic/371</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>